How Skeptics Make Us Too Trusting and Discourages Thinking
Arjuna argues that Stephen Woodford (Rationality Rules), in attacking Stephen Meyer over the 2016 Royal Society evolution conference, defends not science but an authority structure — relying on ad hominem, misrepresenting the conference's admission that neo-Darwinism needs supplementing, and ignoring the career costs (Günter Bechly) that silence dissenting scientists.
critical thinking · evolution · geopolitics and religion · intelligent design · logical fallacies · philosophy of science · scientific methodology · skepticism
Article drawing on this episode: coming soon.
Comments
Comments are coming soon.