The Evolutionary Argument Against Naturalism Debate @MaverickChristian vs David Pallmann
Maverick Christian defends his reformulated, epistemic-probability version of Plantinga's evolutionary argument against naturalism — that mental states are effectively epiphenomenal on naturalism, so evolution gives no reason to trust our cognitive faculties — against David Pallmann, whose local-vs-global phenomenology objection collapses under cross-examination until he concedes on air that this version survives his objections.
apologetics · cognitive reliability · epistemology · evolution · naturalism · philosophy of mind · philosophy of religion · theism vs atheism
Article drawing on this episode: coming soon.
Comments
Comments are coming soon.